Quote of the day

Everything in the present changes everything in the past

Syndicate content

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Follow oD on Twitter:


Join our Facebook group:
Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

openDemocracy likes:

Navigation

Recent comments

Signpost Blog


View 5 comments

Religion's cutting edge: lessons from Africa

The experience of Christian-led work for human rights and social justice in Africa poses hard questions to the anti-religious discourse of intellectuals such as Richard Dawkins, says Tina Beattie.

The scholar Conor Gearty, writing in the Catholic weekly journal the Tablet, has argued that the relationship between religion and human rights is likely to become an increasingly significant area of debate, and that human-rights activists have "sought to suppress the role of religious faith in underpinning their movement and giving it a covert zeal and purpose" (Tablet, 1 February 2007). I found myself reflecting on this in light of my attendance at the World Social Forum in Nairobi on 20-25 January 2007, where two related issues seemed central to many of the campaigns and organisations represented: the role both of women and of religion in the struggle to realise the vision of the forum that "another world is possible".

The idea that religion may be a close ally of those in civil society and human-rights organisations campaigning for a better world might surprise or even scandalise the growing number of western secularists who believe that religion is always and everywhere the enemy of just and free societies. Influential commentators such as Richard Dawkins, Polly Toynbee, AC Grayling and Martin Amis have contributed to a growing climate of hostility to religion in British culture, so that there is a widening gulf between public perceptions of religious and secular worldviews with regard to issues such as freedom of speech, democracy and equality".

Tina Beattie is reader in Christian studies, Roehampton University, England. Among her books are God's Mother, Eve's Advocate (Allen & Unwin, 2002) and New Catholic Feminism: Theology and Theory (Routledge 2005)

Also by Tina Beattie in openDemocracy:

"Pope Benedict XVI and jihad: beyond words" (18 September 2006)

"Veiling the issues: a distractive debate"
(24 October 2006)

"Religion in Britain in the Blair era"
(10 January 2007)

Tina Beattie's most recent article is:

"Has liberation theology had its day?", Tablet,
(10 February 2007)

There is good reason for this if one defines religion as George W Bush's version of Christianity or Osama bin Laden's version of Islam. The problem is that many of the commentaries on religion in the British press or in works such as Dawkins's recent book The God Delusion are highly polemical and ill-informed in their failure to acknowledge the diverse cultures and values which fall within that inadequate term "religion".

There is indeed a worrying rise of violent forms of religious fundamentalism and the reasons for this are complex, but the phenomenon still encompasses only a small minority of the world's believers. At the World Social Forum, it became clear that there is a much wider and more representative movement of people from different faiths who work together with others in civil society and human-rights organisations to challenge the injustices of the prevailing economic order.

Strolling amidst the jostling multicultural melée of activists, demonstrators, and slum-dwellers, it was startling to realise how many of the stalls and workshops were run by Christian groups in particular, campaigning on everything from justice for street-children to HIV/Aids projects and rights for women. In the daily newspaper published during the forum, Hilmi Toros wrote: "it is in a multitude of steaming tents run by faith-based groups that crucial issues ranging from good governance to peace building or poverty and HIV/Aids - are being freely debated."

In one workshop I attended on religion and the media, it was suggested that disillusionment with politics has led many to turn to religious institutions as the most effective forum for bringing about political change. A Honduran activist for women's rights told us that in Honduras the churches are the only places where a woman can speak.

The high visibility of religious groups caused consternation to some campaigners, with one observing that he had trouble understanding this coalition between the left and religion. The executive director of Oxfam Netherlands, Sylvia Borren, acknowledged the role played by religious groups but expressed concern that they were also "selling their religious message".

 

Women at the centre

Yet proselytisation was clearly not the aim of the religious organisations represented at the WSF. Rather, from positions shaped by different varieties and degrees of faith (including many forms of faith in non-religious world views ranging from liberal democracy to Marxism), people transcended their differences in order to make a show of solidarity against the combined forces of rampant capitalism and political corruption which blight the lives of too many in the modern world.

That blight is conspicuous in Nairobi, where a third of the people live in slums while corrupt politicians cling to power in a city marked by vivid contrasts which could be a metaphor for the global community. The rich live imprisoned behind high walls topped with razor-wire, with bars on their windows and armed guards at their gates, while those seeking to venture out onto the streets must negotiate their way through hawkers, beggars, pickpockets and armed robbers in a city where the traffic situation lends a new meaning to the word chaos. Yet Nairobi is also an exhilarating city, vibrant and teeming with an entrepreneurial spirit which turns every street corner into a market stall.

The significance of religious perspectives at the World Social Forum may have been heightened by the fact that religion is arguably the dominant cultural influence across much of Africa, and this is certainly true of Kenya. The daily obituary columns include photographs of those who have died under bold headings which say "Promoted to Glory". Nairobi's battered buses and matatus (a cross between a taxi and a minibus), display bright slogans proclaiming faith in God, which seems like a wise insurance policy for those travelling in them.

Also in openDemocracy on the World Social Forum:

Patricia Daniel, "Is another world possible without the women’s perspective?"
(18 January 2007)

Anthony Barnett, "The three faces of the World Social Forum"
(30 January 2007)

I was part of a group visiting Kibera, Africa's largest slum and home to some 700,000 people, on a Sunday morning. As we walked through the stinking alleys negotiating our way round stagnant puddles and piles of rubbish, the voices of American-style preachers resonated around us, each proclaiming his version of salvation from a corrugated tin shack. This is indeed religion as the opium of the people, a form of Christianity inspired and sometimes funded by American evangelists, which offers potent emotional release but little by way of social action.

But I also met groups of women (they were nearly all women) in the slums and the rural areas of Kenya and Tanzania in the week following the forum who, sustained by their Christian faith, form self-help groups for the destitute and vulnerable, run microcredit schemes, visit those who are bedridden because of HIV/Aids, and share their pitiful resources with those who are even more desperate than they are, while speaking out against the corruption of politicians who buy votes and make false promises to the poor.

The next time somebody tells me that feminism is the preoccupation of a minority of affluent white women, I will tell them about the women I met in some of the poorest places in Africa, for whom the struggle for human dignity and full equality is a living daily battle against the combined forces of culture and economics, which puts many western so-called feminists to shame.

The light within

This is not to deny the problems and tensions that arise when religious organisations are central to the struggle for justice. The World Social Forum was host to a brave group of Kenyan gay and lesbian activists who, defying the country's laws against homosexuality, sought solidarity and protection within that international gathering to proclaim their rights. There were several groups campaigning for women's sexual and reproductive rights, although interestingly, the workshop I attended gathered together a diverse group of men as well as women, including a religious sister in full habit and a veiled, Muslim woman. Religious sisters were prominent in the struggle against the trafficking of women and children.

The fragile coalition which allowed for religious campaigners to work side-by-side with those lobbying for sexual rights in the hopeful ambience of an international gathering beneath the blue African skies may seem somewhat less sustainable when we disperse to our chillier home environments, but the spirit which inspired it surely deserves recognition if we seek to be better informed about the complex relationship between religion and civil society. Long after the last western campaigners have jetted back to their homes in London, New York and Rome, a committed network of religious believers - priests, nuns and ordinary women and men - will continue to provide the only effective form of social support to millions across Africa.

We should cherish the freedom of speech which allows public figures like Richard Dawkins to vent their spleen against religion as vociferously as they wish to. But in giving them the oxygen of so much publicity, we are fuelling a culture of prejudice and ignorance which might militate against the very values they claim to be defending in the quest for a more just and equitable world. If a better world is possible, it is unlikely to come about without the dedicated struggles of religious believers and the visions which inspire them.

Average rating
(5 votes)
read on

Pippa Norris & Ronald Inglehart, Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (Cambridge University Press, 2004) US, UK

Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin, 2006) US, UK

 
Copyright © Tina Beattie, . Published by openDemocracy Ltd. You may download and print extracts from this article for your own personal and non-commercial use only. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Contact us if you wish to discuss republication. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

Comments


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

charles_9 said:



Fri, 2007-02-16 13:32
I am glad to read that"The World Social Forum was host to a brave group of Kenyan gay and lesbian activists who, defying the country's laws against homosexuality, sought solidarity and protection within that international gathering to proclaim their rights." However, I doubt if these people had much support from religious groups.

African countries appear to be wanting to out-do each other in the ferociousness of their anti-gay laws (witness the current goings on in Nigeria) and, everywhere, the lawmakers justify their anti-gay actions by referring to their holy books.

Whereas right-minded people seeking social justice might normally want to campaign for better women's rights, environmental issues, anti-poverty and development issues, it is religion which stops many for extending their work to gay people. THIS is a big part of what is wrong with religion.

rossputin said:



Fri, 2007-02-16 16:35
Dr. Beattie:

In this article, you slip in a couple of subtle items which deserve objection.

First, although I am not Christian, and no fan of President Bush's tendency to want to include faith-based organizations in the activities of government, it is fairly outrageous to imply a similarity between "Bush's version of Christianity" and "Osama bin Laden's version of Islam". There are many people who oppose the war in Iraq for various reasons, but I have never heard anyone (nor would I ever expect to hear from an intelligent person) that part of the motivation for the war was some sort of crusade-like attempt to replace Islam with Christianity. On the other hand, killing or converting non-Muslims is precisely the goal not only of bin Laden but, if you study history, the goal of Mohammed himself and the religion he founded.

Second, and I suppose this is actually not so subtle, is your unconscionable juxtaposition of "rampant capitalism" and "political corruption", as if somehow capitalism is a source of evil or destruction. Even the use of the word "rampant" as a modifier betrays your leftist bias. As if your view weren't clear already, you then call capitalism a source of "blight".

While the results of capitalism are not always pretty, capitalism is the single greatest force for good in history. There is no system which is more capable of or more responsible for raising living standards among the world's poor. In most places where the poor are remaining poor, it is not the fault of capitalism but of politicians and systems which prevent true capitalism. The single biggest impediment to improved living standards is a lack of property rights. Whether you like it or not, people who do not live in ivory towers tend to be inherently capitalist. In other words, they believe they can make their own situations better if there were actually freedom to take risk, start a business, etc.

You correctly note the importance of microcredit in raising the poor out of poverty. What is microcredit if not capitalism? Why is it that anything in which "big business" or "corporations" are involved is deemed by people like to to be inherently bad whereas exactly the same sorts of behavior -- based in the same profit motive -- is OK if performed on a small scale or by poorer people?

If not capitalism, what do you propose? Are church groups or NGOs suddenly going to be able to make positive impacts which they never have before? Churches are too small to make a significant difference and NGO's, by funneling most "aid" through governments, simply contribute to corruption and the continuing poverty and repression of the world's poorest. Are the anti-capitalist policy ventures of Stalin and Mao more to your liking? As a very smart economist friend of mine always points out, when someone days that something is good or bad, one must ask "compared to what?" So, I ask you, capitalism is a bad choice of economic system compared to what?

While it was interesting to read your defense of religion in the developing world, something you rarely get from a liberal, your article was polluted by your obvious biases. I do not enjoy defending George Bush, as I am not a big fan, but your discussing his religious stance in the same breath with militant Islam is ridiculous. Even worse, though, your hatred for capitalism represents the worst of liberal elite bias against the only system that has ever proven itself to maximize national wealth and freedom.

To someone arguing that religion does good things for the developing world, I will say this: "Rampant capitalism" is exactly what you and the world's poor should be praying for.

ai_1 said:



Sat, 2007-02-17 17:12
This article does not live up to the usual OpenDemocracy high standards and is intellectually sloppy.

Religion throughout history has been always connected with charitable work, and this applies to all significant religions. Equally, it always involved imposition of belief on individuals and, insofar as organised religion is concerned, oppression of individuals unwilling to follow specific religeous dogma. If Dr Beattie has a magic wand that can somehow retain the charitable aspect of religion and purge its oppressive, anti-Enlightment aspects, she should share it with us and, sooner rather than later, wave it with great vigour over assorted providers of charity, from Hizbullah and Hamas to the US Christian Coalition, from BJP in India to Gush Emunim settlers in Palestinian Occupied Territories, all the way to those marvelous African churchmen campaigning against gays and lesbians.

Yet, if such a magic wand is not available and we are faced with an undivided package deal: charity, but also obscurantism and oppression, it is legitimate to reject it and seek alternative means to do good without doing bad in equal or greater measure.

jimboforreason said:



Wed, 2007-11-21 19:12
Tina Beattie is niave in her belief that most Christian charities have no motive other than to help the poor. It always comes with a price. How many members of the third world falsely swear allegiance to her sky-god so they can gain favor with the religious charities so they can feed their children, even though deep down they know that God is asleep at the wheel? To quote the spokesman for a Catholic charity at the beginning of her piece defies logic. Was not the genocide of Rwanda largely religiously motivated? The track record of Christian charity is not all good. And to say that only Muslims have murdered infidels is to forget the history of America where Indians had to convert or be killed as savages. As Jomo Kenyatta said, "The whites taught how to pray and when we opened our eyes, we had their bibles and they had our land." Yes some organizations do good work, but I suggest, as does the brilliant Dawkins, to encourage belief in the supernatural leads to submissive behavior that may be soothing, but in the end, counter-productive to economic prosperity. Africa is over-run with preachers now, looking to earn a easy living by promising something that has never been delivered. It is the perfect scam. Plus, to perpetuate the belief that a human sacrifice 2000 years ago absolves one of sin strikes me as being the last thing that the poor, superstitious illiterate people of this cause and effect world need to hear. The baggage that goes with Christianity and any religion is too heavy a burden to be carried without both short-term and long-term negative consequences. Does it not matter Ms. Beattie that Dawkins and athiests have much more evidence that god does not exist than the zero evidence you have? Where is God when the children of the world die of hunger, disease, abuse? Where is God when a religion teaches its members that protected sex is immoral? Where is God when he allows intelligent men to become so deranged that they fly planes into buidlings? Instead of reading Christian texts, try reading Dawkins, Sagan, Hitchens...your closed circle of thought just might open long enough to allow you to see the light of day.

dada331 said:



Sun, 2007-12-23 18:47
The Rwandan genocide was in fact the end result of a chain of events beginning with Tutsi chiefs requiring serf-like servitude of Hutus occupying their land following its redistribution in the late 19th century by Mwami Rwabugiri. I find it interesting that you make many simplifying claims about the complex role of religion and its interplay with tribal traditions in Africa when you seem to know little of its history or culture. But it is clear, like many from the West before you, that you are certain what belief system and manner of thinking is best for Africa and its people. As a result, you are no better than those you fulminate against, and indeed worse. For at the very least they are among its people, attempting to help the poor and the sick the best they know how, while you lazily sit at your computer and whine.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options