Quote of the day

Economic inequality is, in substantial part, a political phenomenon

Syndicate content

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Follow oD on Twitter:


Join our Facebook group:
Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

openDemocracy likes:

Navigation

Recent comments

Signpost Blog


Russian war, Georgian democracy

What is the war between Georgia and Russia about? Tbilisi's education minister sets out a strong case


What is the war between Georgia and Russia about? Ghia Nodia, theminister of education in Georgia, wrote in his first openDemocracyarticle (“The war for Georgia: Russia, the west, the future”,12 August) that the conflict - “unexpected and anticipated at the sametime” - that “Moscow wants to teach Georgia a lesson for Tbilisi's openand defiant wish to become part of the west; it wants to send a messageto the United States and Europe that it will not tolerate furtherencroachment on its zone of influence; and it wants to make clear toother countries in its neighbourhood (Ukraine first of all) that theyare in Russia's backyard and should behave accordingly.” The mainobjective of Russia’s action in “Georgia proper”, he writes,”is regimechange”.

Now, in a follow-up contribution (“Russian war and Georgian democracy”,22 August), Ghia Nodia argues that Georgia’s institutions havedisplayed resilience and demonstrated their integrity in withstandingthis Russian ambition.

The threat to Georgia, he writes, means that “the moral andpsychological aspect of the war is no less important than theterritorial one”. He acknowledges that an accentuation of existinginternal political strains in Georgia will be part of the war’sfallout, but contends that overall Georgia can be said to have won a“moral victory”. The lessons are for far more than Georgia alone, hesuggests.

This is a contribution to openDemocracy’s and openDemocracy.net/Russia's extended and continuing analysis of the August 2008 war, which includes articles by (among others) Neal Ascherson, Zygmunt Dzieciolowski, George Hewitt, Ivan Krastev, Evgeny Morozov , Donald Rayfield, and Thomas de Waal.

Average rating
(0 votes)
 
This article is published by David Hayes, , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

Comments


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options